Philadelphia, PA vs Mesa, AZ
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Philadelphia, PA outspends Mesa, AZ by a wide margin per resident — $56,272 versus $12,768, a 341% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Mesa, AZ holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 45/100 (grade D) for Philadelphia, PA — a 45-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Mesa, AZ carries the lighter load at $469 per resident versus $1,069 for Philadelphia, PA. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Philadelphia, PA leads with fire protection at $7,082 per resident, while Mesa, AZ leads with parks and recreation at $953.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Philadelphia, PA at 16% of total revenue, whereas Mesa, AZ relies most on charges and fees at 9%.
Summary
Philadelphia spends 340.7% more per capita than Mesa ($43,504/person difference). Mesa, AZ has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $47 |
| Sales Tax | $107 | $463 |
| Income Tax | $8 | $1,376 |
| Intergovernmental | $6,288 | $1,383 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,790 | $3,334 |
| Other | $4,029 | $2,253 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $1,505 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $7,082 | $422 |
| Highways & Roads | $1,215 | $192 |
| Public Welfare | $1,456 | $829 |
| Health | $229 | $147 |
| Hospitals | $4,048 | $537 |
| Parks & Recreation | $593 | $953 |
| Housing | $4,902 | $4,190 |
| Sewerage | $325 | $38 |
| Utilities | $4,222 | $2,376 |
| Interest on Debt | $3 | $0 |
| Other | $30,692 | $3,082 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.