Philadelphia, PA vs Fresno, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Philadelphia, PA spends 30% more per resident than Fresno, CA: $56,272 against $43,387. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Fresno, CA edges Philadelphia, PA on the Fiscal Health Score by 5 points — 50/100 (grade C) to 45/100 (grade D). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Fresno, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Philadelphia, PA carries $1,069 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Philadelphia, PA leads with fire protection at $7,082 per resident, while Fresno, CA leads with education at $3,942.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Philadelphia, PA at 16% of total revenue, whereas Fresno, CA relies most on other revenue at 19%.
Summary
Philadelphia spends 29.7% more per capita than Fresno ($12,885/person difference). Fresno, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 50/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $337 |
| Sales Tax | $107 | $19 |
| Income Tax | $8 | $501 |
| Intergovernmental | $6,288 | -$4,470 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,790 | $11 |
| Other | $4,029 | $2,070 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $1,505 | $3,261 |
| Fire Protection | $7,082 | $568 |
| Highways & Roads | $1,215 | $0 |
| Education | $0 | $3,942 |
| Public Welfare | $1,456 | $1,946 |
| Health | $229 | $599 |
| Hospitals | $4,048 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $593 | $76 |
| Housing | $4,902 | $2,856 |
| Sewerage | $325 | $0 |
| Utilities | $4,222 | $15,340 |
| Interest on Debt | $3 | $255 |
| Other | $30,692 | $14,545 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.