Philadelphia, PA vs Bakersfield, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Philadelphia, PA outspends Bakersfield, CA by a wide margin per resident — $56,272 versus $11,576, a 386% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Bakersfield, CA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 56/100 (grade C) against 45/100 (grade D) for Philadelphia, PA — a 11-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Bakersfield, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Philadelphia, PA carries $1,069 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Philadelphia, PA leads with fire protection at $7,082 per resident, while Bakersfield, CA leads with parks and recreation at $741.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 16% of total revenue in Philadelphia, PA and 100% in Bakersfield, CA.
Summary
Philadelphia spends 386.1% more per capita than Bakersfield ($44,696/person difference). Bakersfield, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 56/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $1 |
| Sales Tax | $107 | $20 |
| Income Tax | $8 | $1,909 |
| Intergovernmental | $6,288 | $3,862 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,790 | $1,024 |
| Other | $4,029 | $1,915 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $1,505 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $7,082 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $1,215 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,456 | $840 |
| Health | $229 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $4,048 | $425 |
| Parks & Recreation | $593 | $741 |
| Housing | $4,902 | $3,391 |
| Sewerage | $325 | $265 |
| Utilities | $4,222 | $2,679 |
| Interest on Debt | $3 | $0 |
| Other | $30,692 | $3,234 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.