Overland Park, KS vs Topeka, KS
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Topeka, KS outspends Overland Park, KS by a wide margin per resident — $14,435 versus $8,044, a 79% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Topeka, KS edges Overland Park, KS on the Fiscal Health Score by 2 points — 87/100 (grade A) to 85/100 (grade A). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Overland Park, KS reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Topeka, KS carries $30 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Overland Park, KS leads with parks and recreation at $1,786 per resident, while Topeka, KS leads with highways and roads at $353.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Overland Park, KS at 10% of total revenue, whereas Topeka, KS relies most on charges and fees at 19%.
Summary
Topeka spends 44.3% more per capita than Overland Park ($6,391/person difference). Topeka, KS has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 87/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $823 |
| Sales Tax | $861 | $182 |
| Intergovernmental | $1,045 | $3,030 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $6,883 |
| Other | $804 | $4,080 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $93 | $190 |
| Highways & Roads | $225 | $353 |
| Public Welfare | $726 | $3,253 |
| Hospitals | $427 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,786 | $55 |
| Housing | $2,095 | $3,032 |
| Utilities | $0 | $3,548 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $663 |
| Other | $2,690 | $3,342 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.