Overland Park, KS vs Manhattan, KS
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Manhattan spends 34.2% more per capita than Overland Park ($4,175/person difference). Overland Park, KS has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 85/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $861 | $42 |
| Intergovernmental | $1,045 | $20,434 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $2,350 |
| Other | $804 | $3,349 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $93 | $203 |
| Highways & Roads | $225 | $69 |
| Public Welfare | $726 | $806 |
| Health | $0 | $680 |
| Hospitals | $427 | $184 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,786 | $1,328 |
| Housing | $2,095 | $0 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $173 |
| Utilities | $0 | $2,330 |
| Other | $2,690 | $6,445 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.