Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Orem, UT vs South Jordan, UT

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

South Jordan spends 24.5% more per capita than Orem ($2,551/person difference). South Jordan, UT has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 65/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Orem, UT
Pop. 97,100
C
55/100
Budget Balance1
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
City B
South Jordan, UT
Pop. 78,118
B
65/100
Budget Balance79
Debt Burden0
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Orem
South Jordan
Total Spending
$761.3M
$811.8M
Spending / Capita
$7,841
$10,392
Total Revenue
$13.3M
$842.1M
Revenue / Capita
$137
$10,780
Total Debt
$0
$67.5M
Debt / Capita
$0
$864
Population
97,100
78,118
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Orem$134
South Jordan$330
Highways & Roads
Orem$0
South Jordan$154
Parks & Recreation
Orem$752
South Jordan$607
Education
Orem$56
South Jordan$35
Health
Orem$376
South Jordan$0

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

OremSouth Jordan
Property Tax
$201
$57
Sales Tax
$351
$243
Income Tax
$509
$675
Intergovernmental
$137
$126
Charges & Fees
$1,690
$2,895
Other
$2,873
$1,297

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

OremSouth Jordan
Fire Protection
$134
$330
Highways & Roads
$0
$154
Education
$56
$35
Public Welfare
$469
$492
Health
$376
$0
Hospitals
$148
$1,190
Parks & Recreation
$752
$607
Housing
$1,776
$1,101
Sewerage
$101
$191
Utilities
$1,081
$1,767
Other
$2,949
$4,524
C
Orem, UT
Fiscal Health Score: 55/100
Average fiscal health
B
South Jordan, UT
Fiscal Health Score: 65/100
Good fiscal health

Compare More Cities