Omaha, NE vs Philadelphia, PA

Philadelphia, PA outspends Omaha, NE by a wide margin per resident — $56,272 versus $11,180, a 403% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.

Omaha, NE holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 45/100 (grade D) for Philadelphia, PA — a 45-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.

Omaha, NE reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Philadelphia, PA carries $1,069 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Omaha, NE leads with parks and recreation at $742 per resident, while Philadelphia, PA leads with fire protection at $7,082.

They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Omaha, NE at 17% of total revenue, whereas Philadelphia, PA relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 16%.