Omaha, NE vs Long Beach, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Long Beach, CA outspends Omaha, NE by a wide margin per resident — $34,250 versus $11,180, a 206% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Omaha, NE holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 67/100 (grade B) for Long Beach, CA — a 23-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Neither city reports outstanding debt per resident in its current Census filing, which removes debt service as a point of difference between them. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Omaha, NE at $742 per resident and in Long Beach, CA at $698.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on other revenue — 17% of total revenue in Omaha, NE and 12% in Long Beach, CA.
Summary
Long Beach spends 67.4% more per capita than Omaha ($23,070/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $624 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $373 | $36 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $1,760 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,622 | $1,688 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $2,424 |
| Other | $4,672 | $8,836 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Highways & Roads | $319 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,521 | $1,317 |
| Health | $456 | $477 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $2,751 |
| Parks & Recreation | $742 | $698 |
| Housing | $3,045 | $5,782 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $86 |
| Utilities | $581 | $3,889 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $2,718 |
| Other | $4,516 | $16,533 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.