Omaha, NE vs Houston, TX
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Houston, TX spends 29% more per resident than Omaha, NE: $14,400 against $11,180. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Omaha, NE edges Houston, TX on the Fiscal Health Score by 7 points — 90/100 (grade A) to 83/100 (grade A). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Omaha, NE reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Houston, TX carries $863 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Omaha, NE at $742 per resident and in Houston, TX at $361.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on other revenue — 17% of total revenue in Omaha, NE and 7% in Houston, TX.
Summary
Houston spends 22.4% more per capita than Omaha ($3,220/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $624 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $373 | $181 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $39 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,622 | $33 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $3,475 |
| Other | $4,672 | $3,960 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $0 | $295 |
| Highways & Roads | $319 | $175 |
| Public Welfare | $1,521 | $533 |
| Health | $456 | $210 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $511 |
| Parks & Recreation | $742 | $361 |
| Housing | $3,045 | $4,288 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $386 |
| Utilities | $581 | $1,339 |
| Other | $4,516 | $6,301 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.