Omaha, NE vs Houston, TX
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Houston spends 22.4% more per capita than Omaha ($3,220/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $624 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $373 | $181 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $39 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,622 | $33 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $3,475 |
| Other | $4,672 | $3,960 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $0 | $295 |
| Highways & Roads | $319 | $175 |
| Public Welfare | $1,521 | $533 |
| Health | $456 | $210 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $511 |
| Parks & Recreation | $742 | $361 |
| Housing | $3,045 | $4,288 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $386 |
| Utilities | $581 | $1,339 |
| Other | $4,516 | $6,301 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.