Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Omaha, NE vs Houston, TX

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Houston spends 22.4% more per capita than Omaha ($3,220/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Omaha, NE
Pop. 489,201
A
90/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
City B
Houston, TX
Pop. 2,296,253
A
83/100
Budget Balance94
Debt Burden72
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Omaha
Houston
Total Spending
$5.5B
$33.1B
Spending / Capita
$11,180
$14,400
Total Revenue
$13.2B
$127.7B
Revenue / Capita
$26,929
$55,600
Total Debt
$0
$2.0B
Debt / Capita
$0
$863
Population
489,201
2,296,253
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Omaha$0
Houston$295
Highways & Roads
Omaha$319
Houston$175
Parks & Recreation
Omaha$742
Houston$361
Health
Omaha$456
Houston$210

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

OmahaHouston
Property Tax
$624
$0
Sales Tax
$373
$181
Income Tax
$0
$39
Intergovernmental
$2,622
$33
Charges & Fees
$0
$3,475
Other
$4,672
$3,960

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

OmahaHouston
Fire Protection
$0
$295
Highways & Roads
$319
$175
Public Welfare
$1,521
$533
Health
$456
$210
Hospitals
$0
$511
Parks & Recreation
$742
$361
Housing
$3,045
$4,288
Sewerage
$0
$386
Utilities
$581
$1,339
Other
$4,516
$6,301
A
Omaha, NE
Fiscal Health Score: 90/100
Excellent fiscal health
A
Houston, TX
Fiscal Health Score: 83/100
Excellent fiscal health

Compare More Cities