Omaha, NE vs Fort Worth, TX
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Fort Worth spends 29.9% more per capita than Omaha ($4,759/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $624 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $373 | $198 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $851 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,622 | $4,002 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $3,594 |
| Other | $4,672 | $3,439 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $0 | $156 |
| Highways & Roads | $319 | $317 |
| Public Welfare | $1,521 | $869 |
| Health | $456 | $235 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $1,680 |
| Parks & Recreation | $742 | $708 |
| Housing | $3,045 | $4,217 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $267 |
| Utilities | $581 | $2,674 |
| Other | $4,516 | $4,817 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.