Omaha, NE vs El Paso, TX
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
El Paso, TX outspends Omaha, NE by a wide margin per resident — $24,259 versus $11,180, a 117% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Omaha, NE holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 61/100 (grade C) for El Paso, TX — a 29-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Neither city reports outstanding debt per resident in its current Census filing, which removes debt service as a point of difference between them. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Omaha, NE leads with parks and recreation at $742 per resident, while El Paso, TX leads with police at $1,159.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Omaha, NE at 17% of total revenue, whereas El Paso, TX relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 10%.
Summary
El Paso spends 53.9% more per capita than Omaha ($13,079/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $624 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $373 | $65 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $12 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,622 | $690 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $31 |
| Other | $4,672 | $550 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $1,159 |
| Fire Protection | $0 | $233 |
| Highways & Roads | $319 | $83 |
| Public Welfare | $1,521 | $299 |
| Health | $456 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $11 |
| Parks & Recreation | $742 | $151 |
| Housing | $3,045 | $958 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $6 |
| Utilities | $581 | $224 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $40 |
| General Admin | $0 | $17,951 |
| Other | $4,516 | $3,145 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.