Omaha, NE vs Denver, CO
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Denver, CO outspends Omaha, NE by a wide margin per resident — $33,582 versus $11,180, a 200% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Omaha, NE holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 51/100 (grade C) for Denver, CO — a 39-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Omaha, NE reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Denver, CO carries $5,126 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Omaha, NE at $742 per resident and in Denver, CO at $3,319.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Omaha, NE at 17% of total revenue, whereas Denver, CO relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 37%.
Summary
Denver spends 66.7% more per capita than Omaha ($22,402/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $624 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $373 | $2,070 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $236 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,622 | $44,661 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $5,207 |
| Other | $4,672 | $10,100 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $2,455 |
| Fire Protection | $0 | $1,668 |
| Highways & Roads | $319 | $475 |
| Education | $0 | $821 |
| Public Welfare | $1,521 | $764 |
| Health | $456 | $693 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $2,855 |
| Parks & Recreation | $742 | $3,319 |
| Housing | $3,045 | $3,565 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $293 |
| Utilities | $581 | $4,292 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $7 |
| General Admin | $0 | $364 |
| Other | $4,516 | $12,011 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.