Omaha, NE vs Charlotte, NC
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Charlotte, NC spends 42% more per resident than Omaha, NE: $15,854 against $11,180. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Omaha, NE holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 63/100 (grade C) for Charlotte, NC — a 27-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Omaha, NE reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Charlotte, NC carries $2,690 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Omaha, NE at $742 per resident and in Charlotte, NC at $1,571.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on other revenue — 17% of total revenue in Omaha, NE and 10% in Charlotte, NC.
Summary
Charlotte spends 29.5% more per capita than Omaha ($4,673/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $624 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $373 | $541 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $366 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,622 | $1,859 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $2,459 |
| Other | $4,672 | $4,866 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $0 | $463 |
| Highways & Roads | $319 | $41 |
| Public Welfare | $1,521 | $672 |
| Health | $456 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $1,243 |
| Parks & Recreation | $742 | $1,571 |
| Housing | $3,045 | $3,944 |
| Utilities | $581 | $2,244 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $2,226 |
| Other | $4,516 | $3,448 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.