Omaha, NE vs Atlanta, GA

Atlanta, GA outspends Omaha, NE by a wide margin per resident — $25,457 versus $11,180, a 128% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.

Omaha, NE edges Atlanta, GA on the Fiscal Health Score by 5 points — 90/100 (grade A) to 85/100 (grade A). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.

Neither city reports outstanding debt per resident in its current Census filing, which removes debt service as a point of difference between them. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Omaha, NE at $742 per resident and in Atlanta, GA at $1,274.

They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Omaha, NE at 17% of total revenue, whereas Atlanta, GA relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 6%.