Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Oklahoma City, OK vs Tulsa, OK

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Oklahoma City spends 244.2% more per capita than Tulsa ($12,823/person difference). Oklahoma City, OK has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 65/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Oklahoma City, OK
Pop. 681,088
B
65/100
Budget Balance80
Debt Burden0
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency97
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
City B
Tulsa, OK
Pop. 411,938
C
56/100
Budget Balance4
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Oklahoma City
Tulsa
Total Spending
$12.3B
$2.2B
Spending / Capita
$18,074
$5,250
Total Revenue
$23.9B
$0
Revenue / Capita
$35,156
$0
Total Debt
$2.4B
$0
Debt / Capita
$3,520
$0
Population
681,088
411,938
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Police
Oklahoma City$0
Tulsa$628
Fire Protection
Oklahoma City$513
Tulsa$196
Highways & Roads
Oklahoma City$0
Tulsa$257
Parks & Recreation
Oklahoma City$2,014
Tulsa$154
Health
Oklahoma City$5
Tulsa$762

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

Oklahoma CityTulsa
Sales Tax
$763
$97
Income Tax
$1,037
$0
Intergovernmental
$6,852
$0
Charges & Fees
$3,256
$0
Other
$1,836
$53

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

Oklahoma CityTulsa
Police
$0
$628
Fire Protection
$513
$196
Highways & Roads
$0
$257
Public Welfare
$1,525
$86
Health
$5
$762
Hospitals
$2,044
$0
Parks & Recreation
$2,014
$154
Housing
$2,857
$350
Sewerage
$0
$27
Utilities
$4,523
$41
Interest on Debt
$707
$0
Other
$3,886
$2,748
B
Oklahoma City, OK
Fiscal Health Score: 65/100
Good fiscal health
C
Tulsa, OK
Fiscal Health Score: 56/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities