Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Oklahoma City, OK vs Tucson, AZ

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Oklahoma City spends 14.7% more per capita than Tucson ($2,315/person difference). Oklahoma City, OK has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 65/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Oklahoma City, OK
Pop. 681,088
B
65/100
Budget Balance80
Debt Burden0
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency97
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
City B
Tucson, AZ
Pop. 541,033
C
55/100
Budget Balance71
Debt Burden10
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Oklahoma City
Tucson
Total Spending
$12.3B
$8.5B
Spending / Capita
$18,074
$15,759
Total Revenue
$23.9B
$12.6B
Revenue / Capita
$35,156
$23,276
Total Debt
$2.4B
$833.1M
Debt / Capita
$3,520
$1,540
Population
681,088
541,033
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Oklahoma City$513
Tucson$330
Parks & Recreation
Oklahoma City$2,014
Tucson$1,229
Health
Oklahoma City$5
Tucson$0

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

Oklahoma CityTucson
Property Tax
$0
$5
Sales Tax
$763
$309
Income Tax
$1,037
$1,107
Intergovernmental
$6,852
$23,276
Charges & Fees
$3,256
$4,534
Other
$1,836
$952

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

Oklahoma CityTucson
Fire Protection
$513
$330
Public Welfare
$1,525
$1,181
Health
$5
$0
Hospitals
$2,044
$1,314
Parks & Recreation
$2,014
$1,229
Housing
$2,857
$3,091
Utilities
$4,523
$3,555
Interest on Debt
$707
$1,735
Other
$3,886
$3,322
B
Oklahoma City, OK
Fiscal Health Score: 65/100
Good fiscal health
C
Tucson, AZ
Fiscal Health Score: 55/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities