Oklahoma City, OK vs Norman, OK
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Norman, OK outspends Oklahoma City, OK by a wide margin per resident — $55,648 versus $18,074, a 208% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Oklahoma City, OK holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 65/100 (grade B) against 42/100 (grade D) for Norman, OK — a 23-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Norman, OK carries the lighter load at $781 per resident versus $3,520 for Oklahoma City, OK. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Oklahoma City, OK at $2,014 per resident and in Norman, OK at $1,197.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 19% of total revenue in Oklahoma City, OK and 8% in Norman, OK.
Summary
Norman spends 67.5% more per capita than Oklahoma City ($37,575/person difference). Oklahoma City, OK has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 65/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $763 | $383 |
| Income Tax | $1,037 | $2,695 |
| Intergovernmental | $6,852 | $3,093 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,256 | $2,061 |
| Other | $1,836 | $1,341 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $513 | $258 |
| Public Welfare | $1,525 | $2,391 |
| Health | $5 | $49 |
| Hospitals | $2,044 | $162 |
| Parks & Recreation | $2,014 | $1,197 |
| Housing | $2,857 | $2,662 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $139 |
| Utilities | $4,523 | $2,276 |
| Interest on Debt | $707 | $536 |
| General Admin | $0 | $42,647 |
| Other | $3,886 | $3,331 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.