Oklahoma City, OK vs Las Vegas, NV
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Oklahoma City, OK outspends Las Vegas, NV by a wide margin per resident — $18,074 versus $9,085, a 99% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Las Vegas, NV holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 82/100 (grade A) against 65/100 (grade B) for Oklahoma City, OK — a 17-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Las Vegas, NV reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Oklahoma City, OK carries $3,520 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Oklahoma City, OK at $2,014 per resident and in Las Vegas, NV at $1,028.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Oklahoma City, OK at 19% of total revenue, whereas Las Vegas, NV relies most on other revenue at 34%.
Summary
Oklahoma City spends 98.9% more per capita than Las Vegas ($8,988/person difference). Las Vegas, NV has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 82/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $50 |
| Sales Tax | $763 | $386 |
| Income Tax | $1,037 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $6,852 | $1,137 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,256 | $0 |
| Other | $1,836 | $2,806 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $945 |
| Fire Protection | $513 | $280 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $45 |
| Public Welfare | $1,525 | $705 |
| Health | $5 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $2,044 | $356 |
| Parks & Recreation | $2,014 | $1,028 |
| Housing | $2,857 | $23 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $332 |
| Utilities | $4,523 | $129 |
| Interest on Debt | $707 | $0 |
| Other | $3,886 | $5,243 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.