Oklahoma City, OK vs Fresno, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Fresno, CA outspends Oklahoma City, OK by a wide margin per resident — $43,387 versus $18,074, a 140% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Oklahoma City, OK holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 65/100 (grade B) against 50/100 (grade C) for Fresno, CA — a 15-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Fresno, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Oklahoma City, OK carries $3,520 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Oklahoma City, OK leads with parks and recreation at $2,014 per resident, while Fresno, CA leads with education at $3,942.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Oklahoma City, OK at 19% of total revenue, whereas Fresno, CA relies most on other revenue at 19%.
Summary
Fresno spends 58.3% more per capita than Oklahoma City ($25,314/person difference). Oklahoma City, OK has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 65/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $337 |
| Sales Tax | $763 | $19 |
| Income Tax | $1,037 | $501 |
| Intergovernmental | $6,852 | -$4,470 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,256 | $11 |
| Other | $1,836 | $2,070 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $3,261 |
| Fire Protection | $513 | $568 |
| Education | $0 | $3,942 |
| Public Welfare | $1,525 | $1,946 |
| Health | $5 | $599 |
| Hospitals | $2,044 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $2,014 | $76 |
| Housing | $2,857 | $2,856 |
| Utilities | $4,523 | $15,340 |
| Interest on Debt | $707 | $255 |
| Other | $3,886 | $14,545 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.