Oklahoma City, OK vs Colorado Springs, CO
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Oklahoma City, OK spends 37% more per resident than Colorado Springs, CO: $18,074 against $13,222. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Oklahoma City, OK edges Colorado Springs, CO on the Fiscal Health Score by 6 points — 65/100 (grade B) to 59/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, Colorado Springs, CO carries the lighter load at $3,063 per resident versus $3,520 for Oklahoma City, OK. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Oklahoma City, OK leads with parks and recreation at $2,014 per resident, while Colorado Springs, CO leads with fire protection at $1,266.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 19% of total revenue in Oklahoma City, OK and 13% in Colorado Springs, CO.
Summary
Oklahoma City spends 36.7% more per capita than Colorado Springs ($4,851/person difference). Oklahoma City, OK has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 65/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $763 | $257 |
| Income Tax | $1,037 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $6,852 | $6,902 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,256 | $5,676 |
| Other | $1,836 | $2,678 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $513 | $1,266 |
| Public Welfare | $1,525 | $575 |
| Health | $5 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $2,044 | $416 |
| Parks & Recreation | $2,014 | $376 |
| Housing | $2,857 | $2,713 |
| Utilities | $4,523 | $2,566 |
| Interest on Debt | $707 | $190 |
| Other | $3,886 | $5,120 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.