Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Oklahoma City, OK vs Chicago, IL

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Chicago spends 47.7% more per capita than Oklahoma City ($16,478/person difference). Oklahoma City, OK has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 65/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Oklahoma City, OK
Pop. 681,088
B
65/100
Budget Balance80
Debt Burden0
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency97
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
City B
Chicago, IL
Pop. 2,721,914
C
61/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden61
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency22
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Oklahoma City
Chicago
Total Spending
$12.3B
$94.0B
Spending / Capita
$18,074
$34,551
Total Revenue
$23.9B
$231.6B
Revenue / Capita
$35,156
$85,083
Total Debt
$2.4B
$2.7B
Debt / Capita
$3,520
$977
Population
681,088
2,721,914
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Oklahoma City$513
Chicago$10,754
Highways & Roads
Oklahoma City$0
Chicago$930
Parks & Recreation
Oklahoma City$2,014
Chicago$122
Health
Oklahoma City$5
Chicago$426

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

Oklahoma CityChicago
Property Tax
$0
$26
Sales Tax
$763
$74
Income Tax
$1,037
$229
Intergovernmental
$6,852
$85,083
Charges & Fees
$3,256
$2,847
Other
$1,836
$3,463

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

Oklahoma CityChicago
Fire Protection
$513
$10,754
Highways & Roads
$0
$930
Public Welfare
$1,525
$1,858
Health
$5
$426
Hospitals
$2,044
$1,444
Parks & Recreation
$2,014
$122
Housing
$2,857
$6,520
Sewerage
$0
$129
Utilities
$4,523
$2,983
Interest on Debt
$707
$0
Other
$3,886
$9,385
B
Oklahoma City, OK
Fiscal Health Score: 65/100
Good fiscal health
C
Chicago, IL
Fiscal Health Score: 61/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities