Oakland, CA vs Seattle, WA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Seattle, WA and Oakland, CA spend within 14.7% of each other per resident — $34,463 versus $30,055 — so on the headline spending-per-capita measure the two cities are effectively neck and neck.
Oakland, CA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 72/100 (grade B) against 61/100 (grade C) for Seattle, WA — a 11-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Oakland, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Seattle, WA carries $1,100 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Oakland, CA leads with health at $1,016 per resident, while Seattle, WA leads with parks and recreation at $3,923.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 100% of total revenue in Oakland, CA and 13% in Seattle, WA.
Summary
Seattle spends 12.8% more per capita than Oakland ($4,408/person difference). Oakland, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 72/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $1,831 |
| Sales Tax | $522 | $1,094 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $3,496 |
| Intergovernmental | $42,277 | $9,846 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $3,960 |
| Other | $4,337 | $8,544 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $1 | $210 |
| Education | $0 | $1,461 |
| Public Welfare | $2,426 | $3,439 |
| Health | $1,016 | $1,131 |
| Hospitals | $2,498 | $1,871 |
| Parks & Recreation | $955 | $3,923 |
| Housing | $7,811 | $3,727 |
| Sewerage | $1,417 | $952 |
| Utilities | $0 | $6,489 |
| Other | $13,929 | $11,260 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.