Oakland, CA vs Oklahoma City, OK
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Oakland, CA outspends Oklahoma City, OK by a wide margin per resident — $30,055 versus $18,074, a 66% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Oakland, CA edges Oklahoma City, OK on the Fiscal Health Score by 7 points — 72/100 (grade B) to 65/100 (grade B). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Oakland, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Oklahoma City, OK carries $3,520 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Oakland, CA leads with health at $1,016 per resident, while Oklahoma City, OK leads with parks and recreation at $2,014.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 100% of total revenue in Oakland, CA and 19% in Oklahoma City, OK.
Summary
Oakland spends 66.3% more per capita than Oklahoma City ($11,981/person difference). Oakland, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 72/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $522 | $763 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $1,037 |
| Intergovernmental | $42,277 | $6,852 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $3,256 |
| Other | $4,337 | $1,836 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $1 | $513 |
| Public Welfare | $2,426 | $1,525 |
| Health | $1,016 | $5 |
| Hospitals | $2,498 | $2,044 |
| Parks & Recreation | $955 | $2,014 |
| Housing | $7,811 | $2,857 |
| Sewerage | $1,417 | $0 |
| Utilities | $0 | $4,523 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $707 |
| Other | $13,929 | $3,886 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.