Oakland, CA vs Kansas City, MO
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Oakland, CA spends 32% more per resident than Kansas City, MO: $30,055 against $22,820. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Oakland, CA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 72/100 (grade B) against 52/100 (grade C) for Kansas City, MO — a 20-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Neither city reports outstanding debt per resident in its current Census filing, which removes debt service as a point of difference between them. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Oakland, CA leads with health at $1,016 per resident, while Kansas City, MO leads with parks and recreation at $1,309.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Oakland, CA at 100% of total revenue, whereas Kansas City, MO relies most on other revenue at 835%.
Summary
Oakland spends 31.7% more per capita than Kansas City ($7,235/person difference). Oakland, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 72/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $522 | $623 |
| Intergovernmental | $42,277 | $7 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $3,794 |
| Other | $4,337 | $11,150 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $1 | $119 |
| Public Welfare | $2,426 | $3,018 |
| Health | $1,016 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $2,498 | $1,849 |
| Parks & Recreation | $955 | $1,309 |
| Housing | $7,811 | $4,681 |
| Sewerage | $1,417 | $0 |
| Utilities | $0 | $3,123 |
| Other | $13,929 | $8,721 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.