Oakland, CA vs Fort Worth, TX
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Oakland, CA outspends Fort Worth, TX by a wide margin per resident — $30,055 versus $15,939, a 89% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Oakland, CA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 72/100 (grade B) against 63/100 (grade C) for Fort Worth, TX — a 9-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Oakland, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Fort Worth, TX carries $1,921 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Oakland, CA leads with health at $1,016 per resident, while Fort Worth, TX leads with parks and recreation at $708.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 100% of total revenue in Oakland, CA and 15% in Fort Worth, TX.
Summary
Oakland spends 88.6% more per capita than Fort Worth ($14,115/person difference). Oakland, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 72/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $522 | $198 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $851 |
| Intergovernmental | $42,277 | $4,002 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $3,594 |
| Other | $4,337 | $3,439 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $1 | $156 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $317 |
| Public Welfare | $2,426 | $869 |
| Health | $1,016 | $235 |
| Hospitals | $2,498 | $1,680 |
| Parks & Recreation | $955 | $708 |
| Housing | $7,811 | $4,217 |
| Sewerage | $1,417 | $267 |
| Utilities | $0 | $2,674 |
| Other | $13,929 | $4,817 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.