O'Fallon, MO vs Springfield, MO
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Springfield, MO outspends O'Fallon, MO by a wide margin per resident — $15,703 versus $6,570, a 139% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Springfield, MO holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 82/100 (grade A) against 71/100 (grade B) for O'Fallon, MO — a 11-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Springfield, MO reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while O'Fallon, MO carries $234 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in O'Fallon, MO at $992 per resident and in Springfield, MO at $2,552.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in O'Fallon, MO at 100% of total revenue, whereas Springfield, MO relies most on other revenue at 11%.
Summary
Springfield spends 58.2% more per capita than O'Fallon ($9,133/person difference). Springfield, MO has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 82/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $393 | $827 |
| Income Tax | $655 | $822 |
| Intergovernmental | $13,053 | $1,035 |
| Charges & Fees | $862 | $3,451 |
| Other | $1,364 | $4,051 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $144 | $68 |
| Highways & Roads | $88 | $487 |
| Education | $0 | $1,123 |
| Public Welfare | $724 | $932 |
| Hospitals | $40 | $311 |
| Parks & Recreation | $992 | $2,552 |
| Housing | $1,654 | $2,768 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $206 |
| Utilities | $1,130 | $2,850 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $805 |
| Other | $1,799 | $3,601 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.