Nampa, ID vs Pocatello, ID
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Pocatello spends 19.3% more per capita than Nampa ($2,553/person difference). Both cities share the same Fiscal Health Score.
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $1 | $1,118 |
| Sales Tax | $1,733 | $279 |
| Income Tax | $1,453 | $1,817 |
| Intergovernmental | $3,494 | $4 |
| Charges & Fees | $1,859 | $2,593 |
| Other | $3,946 | $3,385 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $182 | $212 |
| Highways & Roads | $198 | $291 |
| Education | $32 | $43 |
| Public Welfare | $725 | $961 |
| Health | $215 | $342 |
| Hospitals | $407 | $138 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,867 | $963 |
| Housing | $2,657 | $2,832 |
| Sewerage | $593 | $123 |
| Utilities | $2,346 | $3,313 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $495 |
| Other | $1,466 | $3,527 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.