Mount Pleasant, SC vs Summerville, SC
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Mount Pleasant, SC spends 22% more per resident than Summerville, SC: $12,111 against $9,946. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Mount Pleasant, SC edges Summerville, SC on the Fiscal Health Score by 3 points — 70/100 (grade B) to 67/100 (grade B). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Summerville, SC reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Mount Pleasant, SC carries $925 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Mount Pleasant, SC at $963 per resident and in Summerville, SC at $631.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 23% of total revenue in Mount Pleasant, SC and 84% in Summerville, SC.
Summary
Mount Pleasant spends 21.8% more per capita than Summerville ($2,165/person difference). Mount Pleasant, SC has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 70/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $437 | $92 |
| Intergovernmental | $6,212 | $4,202 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,912 | $2,363 |
| Other | $3,395 | $971 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $399 | $152 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $527 |
| Public Welfare | $623 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $963 | $631 |
| Housing | $2,205 | $2,315 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $153 |
| Utilities | $3,710 | $2,819 |
| Other | $4,211 | $3,350 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.