Mount Pleasant, SC vs Rock Hill, SC
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Rock Hill, SC spends 47% more per resident than Mount Pleasant, SC: $17,824 against $12,111. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Rock Hill, SC holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 85/100 (grade A) against 70/100 (grade B) for Mount Pleasant, SC — a 15-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Rock Hill, SC reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Mount Pleasant, SC carries $925 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Mount Pleasant, SC at $963 per resident and in Rock Hill, SC at $3,181.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 23% of total revenue in Mount Pleasant, SC and 16% in Rock Hill, SC.
Summary
Rock Hill spends 32.1% more per capita than Mount Pleasant ($5,713/person difference). Rock Hill, SC has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 85/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $437 | $415 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $1,207 |
| Intergovernmental | $6,212 | $8,909 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,912 | $3,386 |
| Other | $3,395 | $4,871 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $399 | $470 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $227 |
| Public Welfare | $623 | $387 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $666 |
| Parks & Recreation | $963 | $3,181 |
| Housing | $2,205 | $2,961 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $37 |
| Utilities | $3,710 | $3,368 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $328 |
| Other | $4,211 | $6,200 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.