Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Mount Pleasant, SC vs Columbia, SC

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Columbia spends 39.1% more per capita than Mount Pleasant ($7,785/person difference). Mount Pleasant, SC has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 70/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Mount Pleasant, SC
Pop. 90,945
B
70/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden0
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
City B
Columbia, SC
Pop. 136,754
B
65/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden0
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency62
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Mount Pleasant
Columbia
Total Spending
$1.1B
$2.7B
Spending / Capita
$12,111
$19,896
Total Revenue
$2.4B
$8.8B
Revenue / Capita
$26,626
$64,353
Total Debt
$84.1M
$190.0M
Debt / Capita
$925
$1,389
Population
90,945
136,754
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Mount Pleasant$399
Columbia$467
Highways & Roads
Mount Pleasant$0
Columbia$454
Parks & Recreation
Mount Pleasant$963
Columbia$1,265

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

Mount PleasantColumbia
Sales Tax
$437
$623
Income Tax
$0
$42
Intergovernmental
$6,212
$6,842
Charges & Fees
$2,912
$8,276
Other
$3,395
$6,537

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

Mount PleasantColumbia
Fire Protection
$399
$467
Highways & Roads
$0
$454
Public Welfare
$623
$433
Hospitals
$0
$1,042
Parks & Recreation
$963
$1,265
Housing
$2,205
$3,604
Sewerage
$0
$141
Utilities
$3,710
$4,665
Other
$4,211
$7,824
B
Mount Pleasant, SC
Fiscal Health Score: 70/100
Good fiscal health
B
Columbia, SC
Fiscal Health Score: 65/100
Good fiscal health

Compare More Cities