Mount Pleasant, SC vs Charleston, SC
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Charleston spends 49.1% more per capita than Mount Pleasant ($11,682/person difference). Mount Pleasant, SC has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 70/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $437 | $1,723 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $2,502 |
| Intergovernmental | $6,212 | $646 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,912 | $0 |
| Other | $3,395 | $4,635 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $399 | $1,726 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $1,309 |
| Public Welfare | $623 | $902 |
| Health | $0 | $2,099 |
| Parks & Recreation | $963 | $3,903 |
| Housing | $2,205 | $5,779 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $191 |
| Utilities | $3,710 | $2,955 |
| General Admin | $0 | $625 |
| Other | $4,211 | $4,305 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.