Minneapolis, MN vs Omaha, NE
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Minneapolis, MN outspends Omaha, NE by a wide margin per resident — $21,910 versus $11,180, a 96% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Omaha, NE holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 65/100 (grade B) for Minneapolis, MN — a 25-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Omaha, NE reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Minneapolis, MN carries $644 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Minneapolis, MN at $3,486 per resident and in Omaha, NE at $742.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on other revenue — 17% of total revenue in Minneapolis, MN and 17% in Omaha, NE.
Summary
Minneapolis spends 96.0% more per capita than Omaha ($10,730/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $624 |
| Sales Tax | $1,989 | $373 |
| Income Tax | $994 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,929 | $2,622 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,040 | $0 |
| Other | $3,254 | $4,672 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $683 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $221 | $319 |
| Public Welfare | $1,500 | $1,521 |
| Health | $0 | $456 |
| Parks & Recreation | $3,486 | $742 |
| Housing | $4,133 | $3,045 |
| Sewerage | $570 | $0 |
| Utilities | $2,398 | $581 |
| Other | $8,919 | $4,516 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.