Minneapolis, MN vs Long Beach, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Long Beach spends 36.0% more per capita than Minneapolis ($12,340/person difference). Long Beach, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 67/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $1,989 | $36 |
| Income Tax | $994 | $1,760 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,929 | $1,688 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,040 | $2,424 |
| Other | $3,254 | $8,836 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $683 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $221 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,500 | $1,317 |
| Health | $0 | $477 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $2,751 |
| Parks & Recreation | $3,486 | $698 |
| Housing | $4,133 | $5,782 |
| Sewerage | $570 | $86 |
| Utilities | $2,398 | $3,889 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $2,718 |
| Other | $8,919 | $16,533 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.