Milwaukee, WI vs Omaha, NE
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Milwaukee, WI outspends Omaha, NE by a wide margin per resident — $19,417 versus $11,180, a 74% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Omaha, NE holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 62/100 (grade C) for Milwaukee, WI — a 28-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Neither city reports outstanding debt per resident in its current Census filing, which removes debt service as a point of difference between them. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Milwaukee, WI leads with police at $3,642 per resident, while Omaha, NE leads with parks and recreation at $742.
They also fund themselves differently: sales tax is the largest single revenue source in Milwaukee, WI at 59% of total revenue, whereas Omaha, NE relies most on other revenue at 17%.
Summary
Milwaukee spends 73.7% more per capita than Omaha ($8,237/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $624 |
| Sales Tax | $6,548 | $373 |
| Income Tax | $1 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $1,231 | $2,622 |
| Other | $3,984 | $4,672 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $3,642 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $802 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $23 | $319 |
| Public Welfare | $180 | $1,521 |
| Health | $1 | $456 |
| Parks & Recreation | $2,206 | $742 |
| Housing | $1,071 | $3,045 |
| Utilities | $1,866 | $581 |
| Interest on Debt | $1,608 | $0 |
| Other | $8,018 | $4,516 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.