Milwaukee, WI vs Fort Worth, TX
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Milwaukee, WI spends 22% more per resident than Fort Worth, TX: $19,417 against $15,939. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Fort Worth, TX edges Milwaukee, WI on the Fiscal Health Score by 1 points — 63/100 (grade C) to 62/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Milwaukee, WI reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Fort Worth, TX carries $1,921 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Milwaukee, WI leads with police at $3,642 per resident, while Fort Worth, TX leads with parks and recreation at $708.
They also fund themselves differently: sales tax is the largest single revenue source in Milwaukee, WI at 59% of total revenue, whereas Fort Worth, TX relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 15%.
Summary
Milwaukee spends 21.8% more per capita than Fort Worth ($3,478/person difference). Fort Worth, TX has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 63/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $6,548 | $198 |
| Income Tax | $1 | $851 |
| Intergovernmental | $1,231 | $4,002 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $3,594 |
| Other | $3,984 | $3,439 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $3,642 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $802 | $156 |
| Highways & Roads | $23 | $317 |
| Public Welfare | $180 | $869 |
| Health | $1 | $235 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $1,680 |
| Parks & Recreation | $2,206 | $708 |
| Housing | $1,071 | $4,217 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $267 |
| Utilities | $1,866 | $2,674 |
| Interest on Debt | $1,608 | $0 |
| Other | $8,018 | $4,817 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.