Milwaukee, WI vs Arlington, TX
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Milwaukee, WI outspends Arlington, TX by a wide margin per resident — $19,417 versus $11,769, a 65% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Arlington, TX holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 83/100 (grade A) against 62/100 (grade C) for Milwaukee, WI — a 21-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Milwaukee, WI reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Arlington, TX carries $594 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Milwaukee, WI leads with police at $3,642 per resident, while Arlington, TX leads with parks and recreation at $1,352.
They also fund themselves differently: sales tax is the largest single revenue source in Milwaukee, WI at 59% of total revenue, whereas Arlington, TX relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 41%.
Summary
Milwaukee spends 65.0% more per capita than Arlington ($7,648/person difference). Arlington, TX has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 83/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $6,548 | $507 |
| Income Tax | $1 | $73 |
| Intergovernmental | $1,231 | $25,062 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $2,949 |
| Other | $3,984 | $3,897 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $3,642 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $802 | $160 |
| Highways & Roads | $23 | $149 |
| Public Welfare | $180 | $826 |
| Health | $1 | $219 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $152 |
| Parks & Recreation | $2,206 | $1,352 |
| Housing | $1,071 | $2,981 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $141 |
| Utilities | $1,866 | $1,385 |
| Interest on Debt | $1,608 | $0 |
| Other | $8,018 | $4,404 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.