Miami, FL vs Omaha, NE
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Miami, FL outspends Omaha, NE by a wide margin per resident — $28,195 versus $11,180, a 152% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Omaha, NE holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 53/100 (grade C) for Miami, FL — a 37-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Neither city reports outstanding debt per resident in its current Census filing, which removes debt service as a point of difference between them. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Miami, FL leads with fire protection at $7,399 per resident, while Omaha, NE leads with parks and recreation at $742.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Miami, FL at 100% of total revenue, whereas Omaha, NE relies most on other revenue at 17%.
Summary
Miami spends 152.2% more per capita than Omaha ($17,015/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $624 |
| Sales Tax | $1,647 | $373 |
| Intergovernmental | $15,037 | $2,622 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $0 |
| Other | $1,399 | $4,672 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $7,399 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $319 |
| Public Welfare | $109 | $1,521 |
| Health | $0 | $456 |
| Hospitals | $1,499 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,783 | $742 |
| Housing | $6,840 | $3,045 |
| Sewerage | $699 | $0 |
| Utilities | $1,295 | $581 |
| Other | $8,572 | $4,516 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.