Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Mesa, AZ vs Tulsa, OK

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Mesa spends 143.2% more per capita than Tulsa ($7,518/person difference). Mesa, AZ has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Mesa, AZ
Pop. 503,390
A
90/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
City B
Tulsa, OK
Pop. 411,938
C
56/100
Budget Balance4
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Mesa
Tulsa
Total Spending
$6.4B
$2.2B
Spending / Capita
$12,768
$5,250
Total Revenue
$18.0B
$0
Revenue / Capita
$35,688
$0
Total Debt
$236.3M
$0
Debt / Capita
$469
$0
Population
503,390
411,938
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Police
Mesa$0
Tulsa$628
Fire Protection
Mesa$422
Tulsa$196
Highways & Roads
Mesa$192
Tulsa$257
Parks & Recreation
Mesa$953
Tulsa$154
Health
Mesa$147
Tulsa$762

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

MesaTulsa
Property Tax
$47
$0
Sales Tax
$463
$97
Income Tax
$1,376
$0
Intergovernmental
$1,383
$0
Charges & Fees
$3,334
$0
Other
$2,253
$53

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

MesaTulsa
Police
$0
$628
Fire Protection
$422
$196
Highways & Roads
$192
$257
Public Welfare
$829
$86
Health
$147
$762
Hospitals
$537
$0
Parks & Recreation
$953
$154
Housing
$4,190
$350
Sewerage
$38
$27
Utilities
$2,376
$41
Other
$3,082
$2,748
A
Mesa, AZ
Fiscal Health Score: 90/100
Excellent fiscal health
C
Tulsa, OK
Fiscal Health Score: 56/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities