Mesa, AZ vs Oakland, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Oakland, CA outspends Mesa, AZ by a wide margin per resident — $30,055 versus $12,768, a 135% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Mesa, AZ holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 72/100 (grade B) for Oakland, CA — a 18-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Oakland, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Mesa, AZ carries $469 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Mesa, AZ leads with parks and recreation at $953 per resident, while Oakland, CA leads with health at $1,016.
They also fund themselves differently: charges and fees is the largest single revenue source in Mesa, AZ at 9% of total revenue, whereas Oakland, CA relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 100%.
Summary
Oakland spends 57.5% more per capita than Mesa ($17,286/person difference). Mesa, AZ has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $47 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $463 | $522 |
| Income Tax | $1,376 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $1,383 | $42,277 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,334 | $0 |
| Other | $2,253 | $4,337 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $422 | $1 |
| Highways & Roads | $192 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $829 | $2,426 |
| Health | $147 | $1,016 |
| Hospitals | $537 | $2,498 |
| Parks & Recreation | $953 | $955 |
| Housing | $4,190 | $7,811 |
| Sewerage | $38 | $1,417 |
| Utilities | $2,376 | $0 |
| Other | $3,082 | $13,929 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.