Mesa, AZ vs Kansas City, MO
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Kansas City, MO outspends Mesa, AZ by a wide margin per resident — $22,820 versus $12,768, a 79% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Mesa, AZ holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 52/100 (grade C) for Kansas City, MO — a 38-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Kansas City, MO reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Mesa, AZ carries $469 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Mesa, AZ at $953 per resident and in Kansas City, MO at $1,309.
They also fund themselves differently: charges and fees is the largest single revenue source in Mesa, AZ at 9% of total revenue, whereas Kansas City, MO relies most on other revenue at 835%.
Summary
Kansas City spends 44.0% more per capita than Mesa ($10,052/person difference). Mesa, AZ has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $47 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $463 | $623 |
| Income Tax | $1,376 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $1,383 | $7 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,334 | $3,794 |
| Other | $2,253 | $11,150 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $422 | $119 |
| Highways & Roads | $192 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $829 | $3,018 |
| Health | $147 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $537 | $1,849 |
| Parks & Recreation | $953 | $1,309 |
| Housing | $4,190 | $4,681 |
| Sewerage | $38 | $0 |
| Utilities | $2,376 | $3,123 |
| Other | $3,082 | $8,721 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.