Mesa, AZ vs Indianapolis city (balance), IN
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Indianapolis city (balance), IN outspends Mesa, AZ by a wide margin per resident — $46,045 versus $12,768, a 261% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Mesa, AZ holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 74/100 (grade B) for Indianapolis city (balance), IN — a 16-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Mesa, AZ carries the lighter load at $469 per resident versus $577 for Indianapolis city (balance), IN. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Mesa, AZ leads with parks and recreation at $953 per resident, while Indianapolis city (balance), IN leads with police at $2,032.
They also fund themselves differently: charges and fees is the largest single revenue source in Mesa, AZ at 9% of total revenue, whereas Indianapolis city (balance), IN relies most on other revenue at 6%.
Summary
Indianapolis city (balance) spends 72.3% more per capita than Mesa ($33,277/person difference). Mesa, AZ has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $47 | $20 |
| Sales Tax | $463 | $178 |
| Income Tax | $1,376 | $136 |
| Intergovernmental | $1,383 | $1,312 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,334 | $2,813 |
| Other | $2,253 | $4,675 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $2,032 |
| Fire Protection | $422 | $397 |
| Highways & Roads | $192 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $829 | $1,469 |
| Health | $147 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $537 | $2,453 |
| Parks & Recreation | $953 | $798 |
| Housing | $4,190 | $2,664 |
| Sewerage | $38 | $248 |
| Utilities | $2,376 | $2,227 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $1,381 |
| General Admin | $0 | $23,227 |
| Other | $3,082 | $9,149 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.