Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Mesa, AZ vs Bakersfield, CA

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Mesa spends 10.3% more per capita than Bakersfield ($1,192/person difference). Mesa, AZ has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Mesa, AZ
Pop. 503,390
A
90/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
City B
Bakersfield, CA
Pop. 404,321
C
56/100
Budget Balance2
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Mesa
Bakersfield
Total Spending
$6.4B
$4.7B
Spending / Capita
$12,768
$11,576
Total Revenue
$18.0B
$1.6B
Revenue / Capita
$35,688
$3,862
Total Debt
$236.3M
$0
Debt / Capita
$469
$0
Population
503,390
404,321
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Mesa$422
Bakersfield$0
Highways & Roads
Mesa$192
Bakersfield$0
Parks & Recreation
Mesa$953
Bakersfield$741
Health
Mesa$147
Bakersfield$0

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

MesaBakersfield
Property Tax
$47
$1
Sales Tax
$463
$20
Income Tax
$1,376
$1,909
Intergovernmental
$1,383
$3,862
Charges & Fees
$3,334
$1,024
Other
$2,253
$1,915

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

MesaBakersfield
Fire Protection
$422
$0
Highways & Roads
$192
$0
Public Welfare
$829
$840
Health
$147
$0
Hospitals
$537
$425
Parks & Recreation
$953
$741
Housing
$4,190
$3,391
Sewerage
$38
$265
Utilities
$2,376
$2,679
Other
$3,082
$3,234
A
Mesa, AZ
Fiscal Health Score: 90/100
Excellent fiscal health
C
Bakersfield, CA
Fiscal Health Score: 56/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities