Memphis, TN vs San Francisco, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
San Francisco, CA outspends Memphis, TN by a wide margin per resident — $184,131 versus $22,111, a 733% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Memphis, TN holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 65/100 (grade B) against 48/100 (grade D) for San Francisco, CA — a 17-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Memphis, TN carries the lighter load at $303 per resident versus $2,031 for San Francisco, CA. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Memphis, TN at $1,397 per resident and in San Francisco, CA at $4,119.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 100% of total revenue in Memphis, TN and 7% in San Francisco, CA.
Summary
San Francisco spends 88.0% more per capita than Memphis ($162,020/person difference). Memphis, TN has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 65/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $10 | $148 |
| Sales Tax | $496 | $3,028 |
| Income Tax | $1,218 | $269 |
| Intergovernmental | $34,065 | $19,762 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,077 | $7,961 |
| Other | $3,994 | $18,918 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $3,351 |
| Fire Protection | $469 | $2,281 |
| Highways & Roads | $277 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $630 | $2,203 |
| Health | $391 | $1,911 |
| Hospitals | $1,677 | $6,939 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,397 | $4,119 |
| Housing | $4,683 | $9,315 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $1,423 |
| Utilities | $2,578 | $21,190 |
| Interest on Debt | $1,158 | $22,798 |
| General Admin | $0 | $14,899 |
| Other | $8,850 | $93,702 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.