Madison, AL vs Auburn, AL
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Madison spends 119.4% more per capita than Auburn ($14,160/person difference). Auburn, AL has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 80/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $73 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $107 | $22 |
| Income Tax | $2,566 | $713 |
| Intergovernmental | $8,683 | $15,016 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,300 | $1,773 |
| Other | $4,323 | $3,814 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $2,061 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $2,129 | $551 |
| Public Welfare | $5,542 | $1,001 |
| Health | $0 | $328 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $1,012 |
| Parks & Recreation | $799 | $934 |
| Housing | $5,194 | $2,229 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $182 |
| Utilities | $3,593 | $1,765 |
| Other | $6,698 | $3,853 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.