Lubbock, TX vs Fort Worth, TX
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Lubbock, TX outspends Fort Worth, TX by a wide margin per resident — $32,743 versus $15,939, a 105% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Fort Worth, TX edges Lubbock, TX on the Fiscal Health Score by 7 points — 63/100 (grade C) to 56/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Lubbock, TX reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Fort Worth, TX carries $1,921 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Lubbock, TX leads with police at $322 per resident, while Fort Worth, TX leads with parks and recreation at $708.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Lubbock, TX at 25% of total revenue, whereas Fort Worth, TX relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 15%.
Summary
Lubbock spends 105.4% more per capita than Fort Worth ($16,804/person difference). Fort Worth, TX has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 63/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $2 | $198 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $851 |
| Intergovernmental | $76 | $4,002 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $3,594 |
| Other | $781 | $3,439 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $322 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $173 | $156 |
| Highways & Roads | $296 | $317 |
| Public Welfare | $258 | $869 |
| Health | $0 | $235 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $1,680 |
| Parks & Recreation | $13 | $708 |
| Housing | $2,128 | $4,217 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $267 |
| Utilities | $45 | $2,674 |
| General Admin | $26,777 | $0 |
| Other | $2,732 | $4,817 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.