Los Angeles, CA vs Tulsa, OK
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Los Angeles, CA outspends Tulsa, OK by a wide margin per resident — $85,432 versus $5,250, a 1527% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Tulsa, OK holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 56/100 (grade C) against 47/100 (grade D) for Los Angeles, CA — a 9-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Neither city reports outstanding debt per resident in its current Census filing, which removes debt service as a point of difference between them. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Los Angeles, CA leads with police at $4,111 per resident, while Tulsa, OK leads with health at $762.
Summary
Los Angeles spends 1527.2% more per capita than Tulsa ($80,182/person difference). Tulsa, OK has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 56/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $64 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $77 | $97 |
| Income Tax | $307 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $134 | $0 |
| Charges & Fees | $459 | $0 |
| Other | $9,048 | $53 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $4,111 | $628 |
| Fire Protection | $1,057 | $196 |
| Highways & Roads | $503 | $257 |
| Education | $829 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,286 | $86 |
| Health | $409 | $762 |
| Hospitals | $2,135 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,347 | $154 |
| Housing | $6,325 | $350 |
| Sewerage | $34 | $27 |
| Utilities | $21,992 | $41 |
| Interest on Debt | $630 | $0 |
| General Admin | $11,586 | $0 |
| Other | $33,189 | $2,748 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.