Los Angeles, CA vs Portland, OR
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Los Angeles, CA outspends Portland, OR by a wide margin per resident — $85,432 versus $23,675, a 261% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Portland, OR holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 63/100 (grade C) against 47/100 (grade D) for Los Angeles, CA — a 16-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Los Angeles, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Portland, OR carries $1,574 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Los Angeles, CA leads with police at $4,111 per resident, while Portland, OR leads with parks and recreation at $2,477.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Los Angeles, CA at 51% of total revenue, whereas Portland, OR relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 19%.
Summary
Los Angeles spends 260.9% more per capita than Portland ($61,758/person difference). Portland, OR has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 63/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $64 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $77 | $1,695 |
| Income Tax | $307 | $130 |
| Intergovernmental | $134 | $8,979 |
| Charges & Fees | $459 | $3,883 |
| Other | $9,048 | $7,916 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $4,111 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $1,057 | $1,700 |
| Highways & Roads | $503 | $139 |
| Education | $829 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,286 | $3,607 |
| Health | $409 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $2,135 | $2,893 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,347 | $2,477 |
| Housing | $6,325 | $3,694 |
| Sewerage | $34 | $630 |
| Utilities | $21,992 | $1,845 |
| Interest on Debt | $630 | $0 |
| General Admin | $11,586 | $0 |
| Other | $33,189 | $6,689 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.