Los Angeles, CA vs Oklahoma City, OK
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Los Angeles spends 372.7% more per capita than Oklahoma City ($67,359/person difference). Oklahoma City, OK has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 65/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $64 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $77 | $763 |
| Income Tax | $307 | $1,037 |
| Intergovernmental | $134 | $6,852 |
| Charges & Fees | $459 | $3,256 |
| Other | $9,048 | $1,836 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $4,111 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $1,057 | $513 |
| Highways & Roads | $503 | $0 |
| Education | $829 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,286 | $1,525 |
| Health | $409 | $5 |
| Hospitals | $2,135 | $2,044 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,347 | $2,014 |
| Housing | $6,325 | $2,857 |
| Sewerage | $34 | $0 |
| Utilities | $21,992 | $4,523 |
| Interest on Debt | $630 | $707 |
| General Admin | $11,586 | $0 |
| Other | $33,189 | $3,886 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.