Little Rock, AR vs Rogers, AR
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Little Rock, AR outspends Rogers, AR by a wide margin per resident — $17,625 versus $10,936, a 61% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Little Rock, AR holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 87/100 (grade A) against 67/100 (grade B) for Rogers, AR — a 20-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Little Rock, AR reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Rogers, AR carries $533 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Little Rock, AR at $2,054 per resident and in Rogers, AR at $1,039.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 25% of total revenue in Little Rock, AR and 49% in Rogers, AR.
Summary
Little Rock spends 61.2% more per capita than Rogers ($6,689/person difference). Little Rock, AR has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 87/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $1 | $3 |
| Sales Tax | $1,239 | $262 |
| Income Tax | $1,234 | $47 |
| Intergovernmental | $5,965 | $11,941 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $2,584 |
| Other | $5,700 | $2,887 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $521 | $473 |
| Highways & Roads | $55 | $38 |
| Education | $39 | $24 |
| Public Welfare | $986 | $1,032 |
| Health | $0 | $326 |
| Hospitals | $427 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $2,054 | $1,039 |
| Housing | $3,902 | $1,969 |
| Sewerage | $82 | $94 |
| Utilities | $1,001 | $1,452 |
| Other | $8,558 | $4,488 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.