Layton, UT vs Orem, UT
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Layton spends 2.1% more per capita than Orem ($167/person difference). Both cities share the same Fiscal Health Score.
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $201 |
| Sales Tax | $91 | $351 |
| Income Tax | $606 | $509 |
| Intergovernmental | $67 | $137 |
| Charges & Fees | $1,740 | $1,690 |
| Other | $2,929 | $2,873 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $68 | $134 |
| Highways & Roads | $71 | $0 |
| Education | $0 | $56 |
| Public Welfare | $627 | $469 |
| Health | $0 | $376 |
| Hospitals | $300 | $148 |
| Parks & Recreation | $799 | $752 |
| Housing | $2,252 | $1,776 |
| Sewerage | $58 | $101 |
| Utilities | $1,194 | $1,081 |
| Other | $2,639 | $2,949 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.